Mini Organs: What Organoids Can Tell Us

Historically, cancer research has been conducted using cell lines that grow in a petri dish. We’ve been able to learn a lot and make much progress in the fight against cancer using this approach, but it also has some limitations, as the environment is not truly reflective of the way cancer cells grow and metastasize within the human body – a three-dimensional (3-D) environment. Additionally, cell lines can mutate over time and then sometimes no longer reflect the genetic and molecular variants of cancer cells.

Over the past 10-15 years, medical research has evolved and grown (literally and figuratively) – what used to only be possible in sci-fi movies and imaginations is now a reality as we create mini-models of bodily organs in the laboratory. These 3-D structures are also known as organoids, and an exciting area of this research is related to cancerous tumors.

Cancer biopsies remove tumor cells directly from the body. Often these biopsies are conducted when a primary tumor is found and removed, and sometimes also if the cancer has grown and spread to other locations throughout the body. This is because tumor cells evolve and change over time, especially as they try to develop workarounds in response to treatment. From the tumor cells that are removed in a biopsy, we’re analyzing the pathology and learning about the cancer on the molecular and genetic level, including any mutations we may be able to target.

Another way we’re able to use these tumor cells is to grow organoids in order to replicate the tumor outside of the body. This 3-D representation of the tumor allows us to conduct research in a way that better addresses the complex structure of the cancer. It is a form of precision medicine or personalized medicine, and allows us to test how an individual patient’s cancer cells may respond to a wide range of treatments.

This video created by the Englander Institute for Precision Medicine provides an overview of how this process works:

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium Day 3

gu_symposium_2017_img_3054The third day of the 2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium started with a Best of Journals session on renal cell carcinoma (the most common form of kidney cancer) and the early poster sessions focused on renal cell, testicular, penile, and urethral cancers.

The first major morning session was focused on “novel targets and controversies in advanced testicular cancer.” Experts in the field first discussed actionable targets in testicular tumors, also referred to as germ cell tumors. This session also addressed a debate regarding treatment intensification in the subset of patients with “poor prognosis” – or germ cell tumors whose blood tumor markers do not decline optimally after initial chemotherapy. This subject remains controversial, but fortunately only affects a small number of patients, as in the current treatment era, after initial chemotherapy treatment, approximately 95% of all patients diagnosed with testicular cancer will be cured.

linehanThe Keynote Lecture on renal cell carcinoma was delivered by Dr. Marston Linehan from the National Cancer Institute. He discussed the current state-of-the-art treatment which is based upon decades of research largely led by him on the genetic basis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Several of his discoveries about the genomics and biology of RCC have led to the current wealth of drugs available to treat this disease. One such discovery was the importance of the von Hippel Lindau gene in patients with familial cancer syndromes that also affects tumor genomics in most patients with clear cell RCC. This discovery led to investigation in targeting the VEGF pathway which is the backbone of most currently approved drugs.

The session on the diagnosis and treatment of local renal cancer (confined to the kidney) started with a presentation on the role of active surveillance or watchful observation in small renal tumors, and was followed by discussions on imaging and biopsy of renal masses. A talk about the use of ablation in small renal tumors was followed by an abstract presentation on a registry of active surveillance of patients with small renal masses.  In summary, experts in the field discussed strategies and data behind the options of imaging and/or biopsy followed by either close surveillance or minimally invasive treatment strategies for patients with small renal masses.

The oral abstract scientific presentation session featured a presentation that followed up on the morning theme of small renal masses, also discussing surveillance, imaging, and circulating biomarkers. The Mayo Clinic group highlighted the success of treating carefully selected healthy patients with cryoablation in an expert center. A novel computer-assisted technique appears to be useful in assessing response to therapy compared to standard radiology assessment. A collaborative group led by Drs. Pal and Choueiri presented results of a large group of patients who had assessment of circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) with a commercial platform prior to first-line or subsequent lines of treatment for metastatic disease.  Additionally, an Italian group presented an abstract on changes in tumor burden and prognostic classification when patients with metastatic RCC utilize an active surveillance strategy rather than take medications or undergo a local procedure. This is important to realize that for carefully selected patients, just because there are metastatic (spread) tumors on scans, immediate treatment is not always necessary. Sometimes these remain stable over long periods of time without treatment and this can be discussed with experienced clinicians.

Kidneys_GU Blog_FBThe final session of the conference reviewed the opportunities and challenges in systemic therapy for advanced kidney (renal) cancer. Imaging techniques to optimally evaluate one’s response to targeted therapies was discussed, highlighting examples of successful treatment with very little change in tumor measurements by traditional techniques. For example, it’s possible for a tumor to appear the same size after treatment by standard measurement, but it can be 95% necrotic (dead) tissue and in this scenario, the patient feels better and may live longer. This would be classified as non-response (or stable disease). Unfortunately, for patients with larger or more invasive tumors, many patients are not cured with surgery alone despite normal scans elsewhere in the body. Dr. Karam reviewed the results of recently presented trials utilizing targeted therapy following surgery. While these are not quite ready for primetime, the medical community is currently awaiting the results of other studies well as current studies utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with surgery. Drs. Vaishampayan and Jonasch discussed the multiple different treatment options available to physicians and patients with advanced RCC. Physicians were reminded to consider referral to a highly experienced center for high-dose interleukin (IL)-2, a treatment which offers long-term disease-free survival off therapy in a selected subset of patients with advanced kidney cancer. Current studies are ongoing to assess different drug combinations, as well as novel agents. The last presentation of the conference was led by Dr. Powles who presented a late-breaking abstract on the randomized phase II study of atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced previously untreated metastatic RCC. While not definitive, the results were intriguing and support the continuing phase III study assessing the use of the combination of atezolizumanb and bevacizumab. There are multiple new studies looking at combinations of drugs and we encourage patients interested in this type of treatment to look for sites that are enrolling.

Overall, the conference was a great opportunity for both academic and community physicians from all different specialties (including medical oncology, urology, radiation oncology, radiology, and pathology) to mix with and learn from each other.  We look forward to participating next February in San Francisco for the 2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Cancer Care During Extreme Weather: Precautions and Considerations

Blizzard on the road.With winter upon us, it is important for cancer patients to be prepared in the case of severe weather. During severe weather, such as a blizzard, it may be difficult to get to Weill Cornell Medicine. All of our physician practices have coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so if you have any urgent questions or concerns, please call the regular number and you will be able to reach the on-call physician.

If you are due for an infusion or injection during an episode of severe weather, we can discuss the risks/benefits of finding a safe way to get to the treatment center vs. delaying treatment vs. finding an alternative temporary treatment center.

Storms can cause travel delays, especially on roads, so consider allowing for extra time and taking public transportation whenever possible. Drive slowly, and remember that injuring yourself in an accident may also impact your cancer care. It may also be an option for you to stay in a hotel near the hospital to avoid hazardous road conditions.

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center is open to serve patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. In the event that the outpatient center is closed or unavailable due a natural disaster (which is rare), the emergency department will likely be open.

If you are uncertain about travel conditions, the emergency hotline is 212-746-WCMC (9262). Travel alerts for road conditions are released by the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA). If you are having a medical emergency or need an ambulance, dial 212-472-2222 or 911.

For people undergoing cancer treatment, blizzards and cold winter weather can impact more than just the ability to travel to treatment. Patients are more susceptible to hypothermia since side effects of treatment can be dehydration, fatigue, and anemia. Patients undergoing or having previously received certain types of chemotherapy can experience extreme sensitivity to the cold. Other chemo patients can actually feel less sensitivity to the cold and a decreased sensation in the hands and feet. This may lead to a major problem because it puts you at risk for frostbite since you are unaware of how cold it really is. Also, patients with lower than normal amount of platelets in the blood, might result in more serious bruising or bleeding with an injury or fall.

It’s important that patients feel safe and prepared to “weather the storm” during severe weather, including a loss of power or blackout. When weather or other issues can be anticipated, make sure you have enough medication and food/supplies on hand.

In general, but especially after severe inclement weather, be sure to communicate with your physician and healthcare team if anything out of the ordinary happened. For example, close the communications loop if you ended up going somewhere else for treatment or ran out of medication. This way we can make sure we update your medical records.

Most importantly, trust your instincts and don’t panic in bad weather. Wishing everyone a very safe rest of winter!

%d bloggers like this: